Customer Service in Different Countries was the blog posting that made me chuckle a little… The reason it did so was that one of my friend living outside the US has been regaling me with some problems that she’s been having. She doesn’t live in one of the 11 countries surveyed by Accenture. They did surveyed about 650 senior executives in different industries from 11 countries — The posting above calls out “the percentage of business customers who switched to other vendors due to poor customer service”. The highest was China (a wopping 55%) followed by Sweden (a huge 46%) while Argetina and Mexico were very low at 7% and 13% respectively.
SU feels
that business customers in Argentina either don’t care about customer service and do not let it influence their business choices and/or we can say that business in Argentina provide great customer service and the business customers don’t find it necessary to switch vendors because the service is so good. Both factors are probably at play here.
I’m not so sure that I agree. I believe that, sure, those are partially correct in some areas, however I think that culture and monopolies also have a great deal to do with it. I started this posting referencing a friend — well, she lives in Belgium. The entire country has had a single electricity provider for as long as … well .. electricity has been around. If you wanted electricity, you simply had to purchase it from them. Somewhat recently, a new company has come into being and is now trying to take away the business. The monopoly that existed is now starting to crumble, however they still hold significant sway over things. And their customer service proves it.
Two weeks ago, my friend notified her current electric company that she’d be switching to this new upstart at the end of the contract. The contract ended. The new electric company, however, wasn’t quite in place yet to give her electricity. Belgium’s law states that electricity is a basic right, so the electric company couldn’t completely turn their electricity off but they were able to put a 1500 Kw limiter on the line. This prevents the simultaneous use of any electricity that totals more than 1500 Kw. I don’t know about yours, but my fridge alone draws somewhere around 800. This doesn’t count lights, stove, microwave, TV, or anything else. Basically, this electric limiter prevented her from doing any cooking or laundry until the other electric company could get the service up and running.
Now here comes the crux of things. The new electric company couldn’t, by law, touch the limiter because it wasn’t theirs, so when they were ready to turn the electricity on 24 hours after the limiter went on… they couldn’t. The monopoly electric company simply kept saying “Sorry, sorry, sorry”… three days went by, two scheduled technicians didn’t show up… more time without electricity.
To cut an even longer story short(ish), it boils down to the fact that the company didn’t have to do anything. They had no perceived incentive to offer good customer service. They were losing the customer anyway. They could simply cause the end user some trouble for their efforts.
Customer service shouldn’t be painful. It should be good. Maybe if this company gave their customers good service all the time, even in the face of adversity, my friend wouldn’t have switched. Maybe.
1 response so far ↓
1 Josh // May 20, 2009 at 10:46 am
I have found customer service is dead in many ways. Nice post. Found this from linkedin.
Leave a Comment